When this space is reserved, it means nothing else can use it. Some applications reserve far more address space than they'll ever use (in some cases, gigabytes more). ![]() Please stop spreading this misinformation, disabling the page file is a bad thing no matter how you slice it. ![]() You obviously have no idea what the page file is actually used for. The argument that things will not run without a page file is for the most part is a lie - it most likely, if at all, applies only to legacy applications that have long been discontinued. Disabling the page files DOES NOT cause any weird issues. It is perfectly safe to disable your page file in many cases. You know what, here, I'll quote the whole thing for you. Just about every point you've made there is either completely wrong, or the conclusion you've reached is flawed in some major way. Go back and read it please, I've already explained all this. I must apologize but arguing with me is kinda hard because I have ran without a PF XP (3 Systems), 2003, 7 圆4, XP 圆4, and 7 x32 (Current). Wastes clock cycles, time, moving data from RAM to PF and from PF to RAM Unnecessary writes are bad, especially for SSDs. The Page File wastes a good amount of space which can be utilized for storage. Without the necessity of thereof, its purpose is not there ![]() Its purpose being an extension of system memory ![]() You need to upgrade, remove bloat, etc if your PF is being used Reliance on the PF does not mean anything good The PF is not anywhere as efficient as physical memory
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |